Leaving the cabin this morning, I heard some rustling, and looking over there I found a common snapping turtle climbing out of the fire pit. I had dealt with some of these guys when doing fieldwork on the Muskegon River, and they weren't fun to deal with. I didn't want this guy biting me (or biting bits off of me) when I would try to move it back to the water, so I went back for some gloves, doubled them up, and went back to move it.
These guys don't like to be picked up, and they can stretch their necks quite extensively, which means that holding them by the sides of their shell will put your hands (and fingers) in jeopardy. To that end, I did what I did when I encountered these turtles on the Muskegon -- pick them up from the rear of their carapace. It does make them hard to carry, being quite front-heavy, and they snap like crazy when you try (and this guy urinated quite a lot when picked up).
Still, placing it into the water, it swam away from the bank.
(FYI, if it wasn't for all the people who let their dogs off their leashes, I wouldn't have thought twice about leaving it where it was. I wasn't so much worried that the dogs might get snapped at, but that the turtle would get maimed.)
Use of the Forest
Public use of Saginaw Forest is encouraged. Rules for the public's use include (but are not limited to):
- No parking in front of the access gate.
- Public use hours are from 6am to 6pm only; no camping on the site!
- No vehicles or bicycles are permitted on the site except those for approved research and teaching use (bike parking available at the main gate).
- Dogs with owners are welcome to visit, but they must be on a leash. (Also see here.)
- Dog owners must carry out all pet waste; please bring your own doggie bag to do so.
- No cutting or collecting of plant material; no hunting or harming vertebrates (this includes no fishing).
- No smoking.
Friday, May 28, 2010
Thursday, May 27, 2010
Poison Ivy on the cabin wall.
I really don't like poison ivy. However, there's some growing on the side of the cabin... Quite healthily, too. BLEAUGH.
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Chimney tuckpointing finished
The work on the chimney tuckpointing is done. It took some time to finish it -- all morning. However, I think that it is well worth it. Hopefully, this will mean that there won't be so much water leaking into the loft area. Before today, the chimney looked like it was about to fall apart...
The guys also filled in some holes in the wood that seemed to be letting mice get into the loft area. Hopefully, this flow will also be staunched.
The guys also filled in some holes in the wood that seemed to be letting mice get into the loft area. Hopefully, this flow will also be staunched.
Monday, May 24, 2010
Front lawn
It's another sunny day in Saginaw Forest.
Thursday, May 20, 2010
A walk in the woods
There was a small group walk today in Saginaw Forest. I was able to learn some things about the forest of which I was previously unaware:
Gathering in front of the cabin: some introductory pre-"amble" comments.
The arboretum: investigating some of the variety of tree species planted in the forest.
Ambling: walking through the (originally planted) pine stands. These stands were planted waaay back in 1904. This particular section (between stands 2a and 2b) has suffered a lot of wind damage over the years (and is now having to suffer ivy).
On the ground discussion: stopping to listed to a brief explanation of how forest stands can retain diversity, thanks to tree gaps. Also a discussion on how selective forestry can actually seriously degrade a forest, using the example of Beaver Island.
- There was an historical offer to clear-cut some of the forest, which was declined.
- The scots pine planted north of the lake is uncommon because of its straightness (normally, they grow a little crooked).
- There are measuring tapes that allow one to quickly determine the diameter of a tree.
- At least one catalpa remains on the north side of the lake.
- A new species of tree was discovered in Saginaw Forest during the last century.
Gathering in front of the cabin: some introductory pre-"amble" comments.
The arboretum: investigating some of the variety of tree species planted in the forest.
Ambling: walking through the (originally planted) pine stands. These stands were planted waaay back in 1904. This particular section (between stands 2a and 2b) has suffered a lot of wind damage over the years (and is now having to suffer ivy).
On the ground discussion: stopping to listed to a brief explanation of how forest stands can retain diversity, thanks to tree gaps. Also a discussion on how selective forestry can actually seriously degrade a forest, using the example of Beaver Island.
Monday, May 17, 2010
Photos from the surveying
Friday, May 14, 2010
Surveying upper Honey Creek
On the maps, the creek in Saginaw Forest shows up as "Honey Creek"; waaaay above the Honey Creek with which I am familiar (out on Dexter Road, and further downstream on Miller Road), but I suppose that it can well be called Honey Creek, since it is upstream of the creek, after the creek bifurcates south of Jackson Road. Anyway, now that I know its name, I don't have to keep referring to it as, "the creek behind the cabin" or "the ephemeral creek" or "the outwash creek" or similar.
Today, as part of the management plan, there is a surveyor out on the property, making measurements of the toography fifty feet on either side of the creek's center line. If the school can get the data afterwords, this would be an awesome means by which to create a high-definition topography layer for this section of Honey Creek. However, it only stretches 280 feet from the Third Sister Lake, so Prof. Cotel's class wouldn't be able to use it for much of their analysis (i.e., it ends roughly 100 feet downstream of the lowest broken weir). However, it might be useful for looking at the effect of the still-intact weir on flood management.
There was a bit of confusion initially with the surveyor when he couldn't find the official benchmark in the region of the cabin. It was listed as being on a nail on the electric pole. However, the electric pole he found didn't have a tagged nail on it. Thus, he went through and started doing his own measurements, picking up GPS satellites and triangulating his position. Only after he went through and walked the course of the stream did we notice the other electric pole, standing right along the old survey transect (which is now completely filled in with trees, and thus camouflaging the wooden pole quite effectively). Sure enough, there was the tagged nail. (Of course, with all the trees grown in around the pole, he can't use the GPS from that point, but at least all measurements will now be tied to the official point.)
I also learned from the surveyor that GPS satellites aren't geosynchronous. I suppose that I should have remembered this from when I took my GIS courses, but it seems to have slipped my mind. Still, I wrote about it on my personal blog, linking to two websites that will (hopefully) help with future timing of GPS activities.
They survey is important for the boardwalk project, because in order to actually get to and from the future boardwalk, it is necessary to cross Honey Creek, and apart from a fallen tree that goes most of the way across (necessitating one to jump the last bit when there's water in the creek), there is currently no bridge or similar structure in place. Of course, due to the erosion of the area, I personally think that some additional measures will need to be put into place to ensure that the large trees in the area -- some of which are having their roots exposed by the flood erosion events -- don't fall on top of the eventual bridge. Although I don't like the idea of creating more of clearing (thus increasing not only the chance of invasive-plant colonization, but also more wind-felled trees), it might have to be done in the area around the bridge. But that will likely be a future consideration.
Today, as part of the management plan, there is a surveyor out on the property, making measurements of the toography fifty feet on either side of the creek's center line. If the school can get the data afterwords, this would be an awesome means by which to create a high-definition topography layer for this section of Honey Creek. However, it only stretches 280 feet from the Third Sister Lake, so Prof. Cotel's class wouldn't be able to use it for much of their analysis (i.e., it ends roughly 100 feet downstream of the lowest broken weir). However, it might be useful for looking at the effect of the still-intact weir on flood management.
There was a bit of confusion initially with the surveyor when he couldn't find the official benchmark in the region of the cabin. It was listed as being on a nail on the electric pole. However, the electric pole he found didn't have a tagged nail on it. Thus, he went through and started doing his own measurements, picking up GPS satellites and triangulating his position. Only after he went through and walked the course of the stream did we notice the other electric pole, standing right along the old survey transect (which is now completely filled in with trees, and thus camouflaging the wooden pole quite effectively). Sure enough, there was the tagged nail. (Of course, with all the trees grown in around the pole, he can't use the GPS from that point, but at least all measurements will now be tied to the official point.)
I also learned from the surveyor that GPS satellites aren't geosynchronous. I suppose that I should have remembered this from when I took my GIS courses, but it seems to have slipped my mind. Still, I wrote about it on my personal blog, linking to two websites that will (hopefully) help with future timing of GPS activities.
They survey is important for the boardwalk project, because in order to actually get to and from the future boardwalk, it is necessary to cross Honey Creek, and apart from a fallen tree that goes most of the way across (necessitating one to jump the last bit when there's water in the creek), there is currently no bridge or similar structure in place. Of course, due to the erosion of the area, I personally think that some additional measures will need to be put into place to ensure that the large trees in the area -- some of which are having their roots exposed by the flood erosion events -- don't fall on top of the eventual bridge. Although I don't like the idea of creating more of clearing (thus increasing not only the chance of invasive-plant colonization, but also more wind-felled trees), it might have to be done in the area around the bridge. But that will likely be a future consideration.
Monday, May 10, 2010
Felled tree removed
One of the three felled trees has been removed, thanks to the property management people at the University. Thankfully, too, they didn't bring in a wood chipper, which seemed to me to be redundant.
The other other two felled trees will have to be taken care of later, I suppose. The hanging-over-a-road pine possibly with a pole-saw. And the getting-ready-to-fall one whenever it breaks through the small Aesculus that is holding it up.
The other other two felled trees will have to be taken care of later, I suppose. The hanging-over-a-road pine possibly with a pole-saw. And the getting-ready-to-fall one whenever it breaks through the small Aesculus that is holding it up.
Sunday, May 9, 2010
Downed trees
The winds on Saturday felled a few trees across and near the road. Normally, I would just cut those trees out, but these trees require more than I am able to do, either because it is in danger of falling further (after some other big wind event) over the road:
about to fall further over the road:
or too big for me to get by myself:
All three are near the bottom of the drive, so I hope that the university's groundskeeping staff will be able to cut them out (and leave the wood behind to break down slowly in the forest).
about to fall further over the road:
or too big for me to get by myself:
All three are near the bottom of the drive, so I hope that the university's groundskeeping staff will be able to cut them out (and leave the wood behind to break down slowly in the forest).
Sunday, May 2, 2010
Burned the garlic mustard
Today, I spent about 1 hour collecting more garlic mustard from around the property. ... and then (because it was during an interlude between the rains) burned over one wheelbarrow-full of the stuff. The smoke and steam that came off of it was amazing, and I worked hard to burn the rest of the stuff. Luckily, there was enough wood collected from the fall and winter to feed the multiple fist-fulls of garlic mustard.
And then... after about one hour of burning, I scattered the wood, and allowed the ashes the burn down (an oncoming storm front also helped keep the embers down).
And then... after about one hour of burning, I scattered the wood, and allowed the ashes the burn down (an oncoming storm front also helped keep the embers down).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)